Quadro K2200M vs Radeon RX 470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 470 with Quadro K2200M, including specs and performance data.

RX 470
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
18.12
+131%

RX 470 outperforms K2200M by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking277496
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.51no data
Power efficiency11.989.56
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameEllesmereGM107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date4 August 2016 (8 years ago)19 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048640
Core clock speed926 MHz667 MHz
Boost clock speed1206 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate154.426.68
Floating-point processing power4.94 TFLOPS0.8538 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs12840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1650 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 470 18.12
+131%
K2200M 7.83

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 470 8096
+131%
K2200M 3501

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD69
+156%
27−30
−156%
1440p38
+138%
16−18
−138%
4K37
+164%
14−16
−164%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.59no data
1440p4.71no data
4K4.84no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+151%
45−50
−151%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%
Atomic Heart 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+151%
45−50
−151%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+148%
27−30
−148%
Fortnite 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 71
+137%
30−33
−137%
Valorant 140−150
+143%
60−65
−143%
Atomic Heart 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+151%
45−50
−151%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+134%
100−105
−134%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%
Dota 2 110−120
+144%
45−50
−144%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+148%
27−30
−148%
Fortnite 88
+151%
35−40
−151%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+133%
27−30
−133%
Grand Theft Auto V 73
+143%
30−33
−143%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50
+138%
21−24
−138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70
+133%
30−33
−133%
Valorant 140−150
+143%
60−65
−143%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%
Dota 2 110−120
+144%
45−50
−144%
Far Cry 5 61
+154%
24−27
−154%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40
+150%
16−18
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+150%
16−18
−150%
Valorant 140−150
+143%
60−65
−143%
Fortnite 59
+146%
24−27
−146%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+137%
60−65
−137%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
+136%
14−16
−136%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+144%
70−75
−144%
Valorant 180−190
+144%
75−80
−144%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Far Cry 5 43
+139%
18−20
−139%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Fortnite 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Atomic Heart 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
+136%
14−16
−136%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Valorant 110−120
+149%
45−50
−149%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Dota 2 86
+146%
35−40
−146%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Fortnite 17
+143%
7−8
−143%

This is how RX 470 and K2200M compete in popular games:

  • RX 470 is 156% faster in 1080p
  • RX 470 is 138% faster in 1440p
  • RX 470 is 164% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.12 7.83
Recency 4 August 2016 19 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

RX 470 has a 131.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

K2200M, on the other hand, has 84.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 470 is a desktop card while Quadro K2200M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470
Radeon RX 470
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Quadro K2200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2
4621 vote

Rate Radeon RX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8
39 votes

Rate Quadro K2200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 470 or Quadro K2200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.