GeForce GT 555M vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 470 Mobile and GeForce GT 555M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 470 Mobile outperforms GT 555M by a whopping 967% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 302 | 935 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.75 | no data |
Architecture | Polaris (2016−2019) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
GPU code name | Polaris 10 Pro | N12E-GE-B |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 4 August 2016 (8 years ago) | 6 January 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 144 |
CUDA cores | no data | Up to 144 |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz | Up to 753 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | 753 MHz |
Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 35 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 137.5 | 12.60 |
Floating-point performance | 4.399 gflops | 0.3024 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | large |
Bus support | no data | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
SLI options | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\DDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | Up to 192 bit/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | Up to 1569 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | Up to 50.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
FreeSync | + | - |
3D Blu-Ray | - | + |
3D Gaming | - | + |
Optimus | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 200−210
+953%
| 19
−953%
|
Full HD | 260−270
+940%
| 25
−940%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−33
+650%
|
4−5
−650%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
+500%
|
7−8
−500%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
+1500%
|
2−3
−1500%
|
Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+660%
|
5−6
−660%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−33
+650%
|
4−5
−650%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+2100%
|
2−3
−2100%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
+1175%
|
4−5
−1175%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+2260%
|
5−6
−2260%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
+517%
|
6−7
−517%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 90−95
+475%
|
16−18
−475%
|
Metro Exodus | 65−70
+983%
|
6−7
−983%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
+1600%
|
3−4
−1600%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 60−65
+589%
|
9−10
−589%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 85−90
+162%
|
30−35
−162%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
+500%
|
7−8
−500%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
+1500%
|
2−3
−1500%
|
Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+660%
|
5−6
−660%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−33
+650%
|
4−5
−650%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+2100%
|
2−3
−2100%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
+1175%
|
4−5
−1175%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+2260%
|
5−6
−2260%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
+517%
|
6−7
−517%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 90−95
+475%
|
16−18
−475%
|
Metro Exodus | 65−70
+983%
|
6−7
−983%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
+1600%
|
3−4
−1600%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 60−65
+589%
|
9−10
−589%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+258%
|
12−14
−258%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 85−90
+162%
|
30−35
−162%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
+500%
|
7−8
−500%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35
+1500%
|
2−3
−1500%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+660%
|
5−6
−660%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−33
+650%
|
4−5
−650%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+2100%
|
2−3
−2100%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+2260%
|
5−6
−2260%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
+517%
|
6−7
−517%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 90−95
+475%
|
16−18
−475%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 60−65
+589%
|
9−10
−589%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+258%
|
12−14
−258%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 85−90
+162%
|
30−35
−162%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
+1600%
|
3−4
−1600%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+1700%
|
2−3
−1700%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+1350%
|
2−3
−1350%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
+2000%
|
1−2
−2000%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+1056%
|
9−10
−1056%
|
Hitman 3 | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 35−40
+660%
|
5−6
−660%
|
Metro Exodus | 35−40
+1067%
|
3−4
−1067%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 35−40
+1167%
|
3−4
−1167%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+2000%
|
1−2
−2000%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 110−120
+1156%
|
9−10
−1156%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+675%
|
4−5
−675%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
Hitman 3 | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 95−100
+978%
|
9−10
−978%
|
Metro Exodus | 20−22
+1900%
|
1−2
−1900%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+1200%
|
2−3
−1200%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+2000%
|
1−2
−2000%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+467%
|
3−4
−467%
|
This is how RX 470 Mobile and GT 555M compete in popular games:
- RX 470 Mobile is 953% faster in 900p
- RX 470 Mobile is 940% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 470 Mobile is 2260% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 470 Mobile surpassed GT 555M in all 51 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 18.14 | 1.70 |
Recency | 4 August 2016 | 6 January 2011 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 35 Watt |
RX 470 Mobile has a 967.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
GT 555M, on the other hand, has 242.9% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 470 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 555M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.