GeForce GT 440 vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile

Place in the ranking	303	897
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.00	0.08
Power efficiency	14.71	2.10
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Ellesmere	GF108
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 August 2016 (8 years ago)	1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549.99	$79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 470 Mobile has 12400% better value for money than GT 440.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	96
Core clock speed	926 MHz	810 MHz
Boost clock speed	1074 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,700 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	98 °C
Texture fill rate	137.5	12.96
Floating-point processing power	4.399 TFLOPS	0.311 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	4
TMUs	128	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Standard memory config per GPU	no data	1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5)
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	HDMIVGADual Link DVI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 Mobile 18.20
+815%

GT 440 1.99

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 470 Mobile 10715
+1161%

GT 440 850

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33
+900%

3−4

−900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +950%	4−5 −950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +967%	3−4 −967%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +933%	6−7 −933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +850%	4−5 −850%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +1000%	4−5 −1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +920%	5−6 −920%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +883%	12−14 −883%
Hitman 3	35−40 +825%	4−5 −825%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +820%	10−11 −820%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +829%	7−8 −829%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +920%	5−6 −920%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +933%	6−7 −933%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +889%	9−10 −889%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +950%	4−5 −950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +967%	3−4 −967%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +933%	6−7 −933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +850%	4−5 −850%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +1000%	4−5 −1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +920%	5−6 −920%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +883%	12−14 −883%
Hitman 3	35−40 +825%	4−5 −825%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +820%	10−11 −820%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +829%	7−8 −829%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +920%	5−6 −920%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +933%	6−7 −933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +975%	4−5 −975%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +889%	9−10 −889%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +950%	4−5 −950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +967%	3−4 −967%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +850%	4−5 −850%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +1000%	4−5 −1000%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +883%	12−14 −883%
Hitman 3	35−40 +825%	4−5 −825%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +820%	10−11 −820%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +933%	6−7 −933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +975%	4−5 −975%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +889%	9−10 −889%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+920%

5−6

−920%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +1100%	3−4 −1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +867%	3−4 −867%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +850%	2−3 −850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +940%	10−11 −940%
Hitman 3	21−24 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +850%	4−5 −850%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +850%	4−5 −850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +842%	12−14 −842%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+933%

3−4

−933%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +850%	2−3 −850%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Hitman 3	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +870%	10−11 −870%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +900%	2−3 −900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +850%	2−3 −850%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +1200%	2−3 −1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+1600%

1−2

−1600%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.20	1.99
Recency	4 August 2016	1 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	65 Watt