Radeon HD 2600 XT vs RX 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 460 and Radeon HD 2600 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 460
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
10.62
+1355%

RX 460 outperforms ATI HD 2600 XT by a whopping 1355% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking4011123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.18no data
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code namePolaris 11 / Baffin XTRV630
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 August 2016 (7 years ago)28 June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 $199
Current price$397 (4.6x MSRP)$144 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 460 and ATI HD 2600 XT have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896120
Core clock speed1090 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate67.206.400
Floating-point performance2,150 gflops192 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 460 10.62
+1355%
ATI HD 2600 XT 0.73

RX 460 outperforms HD 2600 XT by 1355% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 460 4103
+1355%
ATI HD 2600 XT 282

RX 460 outperforms HD 2600 XT by 1355% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
1440p83
+1560%
5−6
−1560%
4K20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 230−240
+1338%
16−18
−1338%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 450−500
+1224%
34
−1224%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 230−240
+1338%
16−18
−1338%
Battlefield 5 450−500
+1264%
30−35
−1264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 300−310
+1329%
21−24
−1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 230−240
+1338%
16−18
−1338%
Far Cry 5 350−400
+1300%
24−27
−1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 400−450
+1233%
30−33
−1233%
Forza Horizon 4 800−850
+1304%
57
−1304%
Hitman 3 290−300
+1350%
20−22
−1350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2000−2050
+1349%
138
−1349%
Metro Exodus 600−650
+1264%
44
−1264%
Red Dead Redemption 2 400−450
+1233%
30−33
−1233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 450−500
+1264%
30−35
−1264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 500−550
+1251%
35−40
−1251%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 400−450
+1329%
28
−1329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 230−240
+1338%
16−18
−1338%
Battlefield 5 300−310
+1264%
22
−1264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 300−310
+1329%
21−24
−1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 230−240
+1338%
16−18
−1338%
Far Cry 5 350−400
+1300%
24−27
−1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 450−500
+1352%
31
−1352%
Forza Horizon 4 700−750
+1273%
50−55
−1273%
Hitman 3 290−300
+1350%
20−22
−1350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 600−650
+1264%
40−45
−1264%
Metro Exodus 500−550
+1289%
36
−1289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 400−450
+1233%
30−33
−1233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 450−500
+1264%
30−35
−1264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 500−550
+1251%
37
−1251%
Watch Dogs: Legion 500−550
+1251%
35−40
−1251%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 240−250
+1312%
17
−1312%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 230−240
+1338%
16−18
−1338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 300−310
+1329%
21−24
−1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 230−240
+1338%
16−18
−1338%
Far Cry 5 350−400
+1300%
24−27
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 550−600
+1241%
41
−1241%
Horizon Zero Dawn 500−550
+1289%
36
−1289%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 450−500
+1264%
30−35
−1264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 300−310
+1204%
23
−1204%
Watch Dogs: Legion 500−550
+1251%
35−40
−1251%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 400−450
+1233%
30−33
−1233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 300−310
+1329%
21−24
−1329%
Far Cry New Dawn 260−270
+1344%
18−20
−1344%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 140−150
+1300%
10−11
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−105
+1329%
7−8
−1329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 180−190
+1285%
12−14
−1285%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+1300%
5−6
−1300%
Far Cry 5 240−250
+1312%
16−18
−1312%
Forza Horizon 4 290−300
+1350%
20−22
−1350%
Hitman 3 200−210
+1329%
14−16
−1329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+1300%
25
−1300%
Metro Exodus 230−240
+1338%
16−18
−1338%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
+1300%
14−16
−1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+1300%
10−11
−1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+1317%
6−7
−1317%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 260−270
+1344%
18−20
−1344%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+1285%
13
−1285%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+1275%
8−9
−1275%
Hitman 3 100−105
+1329%
7−8
−1329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+1355%
10−12
−1355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+1317%
6−7
−1317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+1317%
12
−1317%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+1317%
6−7
−1317%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+1300%
5−6
−1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+1300%
5−6
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+1317%
6−7
−1317%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+1285%
12−14
−1285%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+1285%
13
−1285%
Metro Exodus 170−180
+1317%
12
−1317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 140−150
+1300%
10−11
−1300%

This is how RX 460 and ATI HD 2600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 460 is 2000% faster in 1080p
  • RX 460 is 1560% faster in 1440p
  • RX 460 is 1900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.62 0.73
Recency 8 August 2016 28 June 2007
Cost $86 $199
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt

The Radeon RX 460 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2600 XT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460
Radeon RX 460
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Radeon HD 2600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 943 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 75 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.