GeForce 610M vs Radeon RX 460

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 460 with GeForce 610M, including specs and performance data.

RX 460
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.18
+1312%

RX 460 outperforms 610M by a whopping 1312% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4421168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.12no data
Power efficiency9.674.28
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBaffinGF119
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 December 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89648
Core clock speed1090 MHz738 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate67.205.904
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS0.1417 TFLOPS
Video decodersno dataH.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p
ROPs164
TMUs568

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sUp to 14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 460 9.18
+1312%
GeForce 610M 0.65

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 460 4101
+1309%
GeForce 610M 291

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 460 8597
+1594%
GeForce 610M 508

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
1440p50
+1567%
3−4
−1567%
4K20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.10no data
1440p1.72no data
4K4.30no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Far Cry 5 40
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
Fortnite 116
+1350%
8−9
−1350%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+1040%
5−6
−1040%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36
+350%
8−9
−350%
Valorant 90−95
+224%
27−30
−224%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+645%
20−22
−645%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Dota 2 70−75
+446%
12−14
−446%
Far Cry 5 37
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Fortnite 39
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Forza Horizon 4 54
+980%
5−6
−980%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Metro Exodus 21
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 28
+250%
8−9
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+825%
4−5
−825%
Valorant 90−95
+224%
27−30
−224%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Dota 2 70−75
+446%
12−14
−446%
Far Cry 5 34
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+720%
5−6
−720%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20
+150%
8−9
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+475%
4−5
−475%
Valorant 90−95
+224%
27−30
−224%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 31
+1450%
2−3
−1450%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+2433%
3−4
−2433%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+629%
7−8
−629%
Valorant 110−120
+1486%
7−8
−1486%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12 0−1
Valorant 50−55
+1225%
4−5
−1225%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Far Cry 5 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

This is how RX 460 and GeForce 610M compete in popular games:

  • RX 460 is 1950% faster in 1080p
  • RX 460 is 1567% faster in 1440p
  • RX 460 is 1900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 460 is 2433% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 460 surpassed GeForce 610M in all 31 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.18 0.65
Recency 8 August 2016 1 December 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 12 Watt

RX 460 has a 1312.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 610M, on the other hand, has 525% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 460 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 460 is a desktop card while GeForce 610M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460
Radeon RX 460
NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GeForce 610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1069 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 765 votes

Rate GeForce 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 460 or GeForce 610M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.