Radeon Vega 7 vs RX 460 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 460 Mobile and Radeon Vega 7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 460 Mobile
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
10.22
+37%

RX 460 Mobile outperforms Vega 7 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking441529
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Power efficiency12.9511.56
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBaffinCezanne
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 August 2016 (8 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896448
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1180 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate66.0853.20
Floating-point processing power2.115 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs5628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 460 Mobile 10.22
+37%
Vega 7 7.46

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 460 Mobile 7793
+48.5%
Vega 7 5249

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 460 Mobile 5108
+52.6%
Vega 7 3348

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 460 Mobile 31294
+26.6%
Vega 7 24726

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34
+54.5%
22
−54.5%
1440p35−40
+25%
28
−25%
4K27−30
+35%
20
−35%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.53no data
1440p2.46no data
4K3.19no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Hitman 3 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+40%
45−50
−40%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Hitman 3 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+40%
45−50
−40%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Hitman 3 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+40%
45−50
−40%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Hitman 3 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Hitman 3 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

This is how RX 460 Mobile and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • RX 460 Mobile is 55% faster in 1080p
  • RX 460 Mobile is 25% faster in 1440p
  • RX 460 Mobile is 35% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.22 7.46
Recency 8 August 2016 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 45 Watt

RX 460 Mobile has a 37% higher aggregate performance score.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 22.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 460 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Radeon RX 460 Mobile
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1940 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.