RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Radeon RX 460 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 460 Mobile with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

RX 460 Mobile
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
8.82

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms 460 Mobile by a whopping 670% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking49220
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.9278.13
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameBaffinGB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date8 August 2016 (9 years ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8968960
Core clock speed1000 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1180 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate66.08374.4
Floating-point processing power2.115 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs56280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cache224 KB8.8 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−643%
260−270
+643%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.46no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−586%
350−400
+586%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
−614%
300−310
+614%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−586%
350−400
+586%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%
Fortnite 55−60
−602%
400−450
+602%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−632%
300−310
+632%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−659%
220−230
+659%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−665%
260−270
+665%
Valorant 90−95
−669%
700−750
+669%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
−614%
300−310
+614%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−586%
350−400
+586%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−669%
1100−1150
+669%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Dota 2 65−70
−625%
500−550
+625%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%
Fortnite 55−60
−602%
400−450
+602%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−632%
300−310
+632%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−659%
220−230
+659%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−643%
260−270
+643%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−665%
260−270
+665%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
−667%
230−240
+667%
Valorant 90−95
−669%
700−750
+669%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
−614%
300−310
+614%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Dota 2 65−70
−625%
500−550
+625%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−632%
300−310
+632%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−665%
260−270
+665%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−665%
130−140
+665%
Valorant 90−95
−669%
700−750
+669%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−602%
400−450
+602%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−622%
130−140
+622%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−664%
550−600
+664%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−645%
350−400
+645%
Valorant 100−110
−662%
800−850
+662%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−650%
150−160
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−627%
160−170
+627%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
−650%
150−160
+650%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−662%
160−170
+662%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
Valorant 45−50
−614%
350−400
+614%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Dota 2 35−40
−643%
260−270
+643%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%

This is how RX 460 Mobile and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 643% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.82 67.89
Recency 8 August 2016 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 70 Watt

RX 460 Mobile has 27.3% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has a 669.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 460 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 460 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Radeon RX 460 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 17 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 460 Mobile or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.