GeForce GT 330M vs Radeon RX 460 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 460 Mobile and GeForce GT 330M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 460 Mobile
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
10.11
+1738%

RX 460 Mobile outperforms GT 330M by a whopping 1738% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking4121177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code namePolaris 11 / Baffin XTN11P-GE1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 August 2016 (7 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 no data
Current price$95 (1.1x MSRP)$448

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89648
CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speedno data575 MHz
Boost clock speed1180 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate66.089.200
Floating-point performance2,115 gflops121.44 gflops
Gigaflopsno data182

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 460 Mobile and GeForce GT 330M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHzUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data
Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDAno data+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p180−190
+1700%
10
−1700%
Full HD36
+125%
16
−125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 0−1
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 0−1
Battlefield 5 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 no data

This is how RX 460 Mobile and GT 330M compete in popular games:

  • RX 460 Mobile is 1700% faster in 900p
  • RX 460 Mobile is 125% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.11 0.55
Recency 8 August 2016 10 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 23 Watt

The Radeon RX 460 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 330M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Radeon RX 460 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
GeForce GT 330M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 109 votes

Rate GeForce GT 330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.