GeForce 7900 GTX vs Radeon RX 460 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 460 Mobile with GeForce 7900 GTX, including specs and performance data.

RX 460 Mobile
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
10.22
+922%

RX 460 Mobile outperforms 7900 GTX by a whopping 922% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4411101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.860.82
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameBaffinG71
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 August 2016 (8 years ago)9 March 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1180 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt84 Watt
Texture fill rate66.0815.60
Floating-point processing power2.115 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1616
TMUs5624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34
+1033%
3−4
−1033%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.53no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1017%
6−7
−1017%
Hitman 3 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+950%
6−7
−950%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1017%
6−7
−1017%
Hitman 3 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+950%
6−7
−950%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1017%
6−7
−1017%
Hitman 3 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+950%
6−7
−950%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1025%
4−5
−1025%
Hitman 3 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+967%
6−7
−967%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+1000%
4−5
−1000%
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 0−1

This is how RX 460 Mobile and 7900 GTX compete in popular games:

  • RX 460 Mobile is 1033% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.22 1.00
Recency 8 August 2016 9 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 84 Watt

RX 460 Mobile has a 922% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 52.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 460 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7900 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 460 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce 7900 GTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Radeon RX 460 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX
GeForce 7900 GTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.