Quadro RTX 8200 vs Radeon R9 Nano

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking307not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.76no data
Power efficiency8.90no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameFijiGA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date27 August 2015 (10 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40967552
Compute units64no data
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million40,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate256.0708.0
Floating-point processing power8.192 TFLOPS22.66 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs256472
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length152 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB48 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan+-
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 260 Watt

R9 Nano has 48.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 8200, on the other hand, has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 Nano and Quadro RTX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 Nano is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 8200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8200
Quadro RTX 8200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 97 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 15 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 Nano or Quadro RTX 8200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.