GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile vs Radeon R9 Nano

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking306not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.74no data
Power efficiency8.92no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameFijiTU106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date27 August 2015 (10 years ago)9 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962176
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data1470 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate256.0208.1
Floating-point processing power8.192 TFLOPS6.659 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256136
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data34
L1 Cache1 MB2.1 MB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 August 2015 9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 Nano and GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 Nano is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 100 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 211 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 Nano or GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.