FirePro S9300 X2 vs Radeon R9 Nano

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking234not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.28no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 (2015−2016)GCN 3.0 (2014−2017)
GPU code nameFijiCapsaicin
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date10 September 2015 (8 years ago)31 March 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $5,999
Current price$27 (0x MSRP)$5651 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964096
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data850 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,900 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate256.0217.6
Floating-point performance8,192 gflops2x 6,963 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length152 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)HBM
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune+no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore+no data
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.0
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2015 31 March 2016
Cost $649 $5999
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 300 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 Nano and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 Nano is a desktop card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Radeon R9 Nano
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 89 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.