ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE vs Radeon R9 Nano

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking307not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.71no data
Power efficiency8.90no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameFijiRV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date27 August 2015 (10 years ago)26 January 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data250 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,900 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Wattno data
Texture fill rate256.01.000
Floating-point processing power8.192 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs2564
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)DDR
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s2.624 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x VGA, 2x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 128.1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 August 2015 26 January 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

R9 Nano has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 Nano and All-In-Wonder 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Radeon R9 Nano
ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE
All-In-Wonder 9200 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 96 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 Nano or All-In-Wonder 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.