GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M470X and GeForce GTX 675M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M470X
2016
4 GB GDDR5
8.12

GTX 675M SLI outperforms R9 M470X by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking506501
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.99
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameEmeraldN12E-GTX2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)6 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896768
Core clock speed1000 MHz620 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data2x 100 Watt
Texture fill rate61.60no data
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs56no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Valorant 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−2.8%
35−40
+2.8%
Fortnite 50−55
−2%
50−55
+2%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−1.5%
65−70
+1.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%
World of Tanks 120−130
−2.4%
120−130
+2.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−2.8%
35−40
+2.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−1.5%
65−70
+1.5%
Valorant 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
World of Tanks 60−65
−3.3%
60−65
+3.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Valorant 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−4.2%
24−27
+4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 20% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 675M SLI is ahead in 34 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.12 8.35
Recency 15 May 2016 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R9 M470X has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 675M SLI, on the other hand, has a 2.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M470X and GeForce GTX 675M SLI.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M470X
Radeon R9 M470X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M470X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.