GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon R9 M395X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M395X with GeForce GTX 460 OEM, including specs and performance data.

R9 M395X
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
11.48
+314%

R9 M395X outperforms 460 OEM by a whopping 314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking449830
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.851.43
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameAmethystGF104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)11 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048336
Core clock speed723 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate92.5436.40
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS0.8736 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs12856
L1 Cache512 KB448 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz850 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s108.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.1
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+364%
14−16
−364%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+364%
14−16
−364%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Fortnite 65−70
+331%
16−18
−331%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Valorant 100−110
+338%
24−27
−338%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+364%
14−16
−364%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+323%
40−45
−323%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Dota 2 80−85
+344%
18−20
−344%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Fortnite 65−70
+331%
16−18
−331%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+340%
10−11
−340%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+343%
7−8
−343%
Valorant 100−110
+338%
24−27
−338%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Dota 2 80−85
+344%
18−20
−344%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+343%
7−8
−343%
Valorant 100−110
+338%
24−27
−338%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+331%
16−18
−331%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+324%
21−24
−324%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+344%
18−20
−344%
Valorant 120−130
+320%
30−33
−320%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Valorant 60−65
+350%
14−16
−350%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.48 2.77
Recency 5 May 2015 11 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

R9 M395X has a 314.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 460 OEM, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 M395X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M395X is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 18 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M395X or GeForce GTX 460 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.