GeForce 9800M GTX SLI vs Radeon R9 M395X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M395X and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M395X
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
12.22
+327%

R9 M395X outperforms 9800M SLI by a whopping 327% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking445829
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.531.47
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameAmethystNB9E-GTX
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)15 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048224
Core clock speed723 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million3016 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54no data
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs128no data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1210
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+656%
9−10
−656%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+656%
9−10
−656%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Fortnite 70−75
+380%
14−16
−380%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+279%
14−16
−279%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
Valorant 100−110
+137%
45−50
−137%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+656%
9−10
−656%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+218%
55−60
−218%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Dota 2 80−85
+196%
27−30
−196%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Fortnite 70−75
+380%
14−16
−380%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+279%
14−16
−279%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Valorant 100−110
+137%
45−50
−137%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Dota 2 80−85
+196%
27−30
−196%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+279%
14−16
−279%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Valorant 100−110
+137%
45−50
−137%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+380%
14−16
−380%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+343%
21−24
−343%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+277%
24−27
−277%
Valorant 130−140
+389%
27−30
−389%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Valorant 65−70
+379%
14−16
−379%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 45−50
+463%
8−9
−463%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M395X is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 M395X surpassed 9800M GTX SLI in all 56 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.22 2.86
Recency 5 May 2015 15 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

R9 M395X has a 327.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

9800M GTX SLI, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 M395X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 18 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M395X or GeForce 9800M GTX SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.