FirePro S9300 X2 vs Radeon R9 M395

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking453not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameno dataCapsaicin
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 June 2015 (10 years ago)31 March 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096 ×2
Core clock speed834 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data64 ×2
TMUsno data256 ×2
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1250 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 June 2015 31 March 2016

S9300 X2 has an age advantage of 9 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M395 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M395 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M395 or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.