Radeon Pro 5500M vs R9 M390X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M390X with Radeon Pro 5500M, including specs and performance data.

R9 M390X
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.32

Pro 5500M outperforms R9 M390X by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking467307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3 (2014−2016)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameAmethyst (XT) / TongaNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 June 2015 (9 years ago)13 November 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54139.2
Floating-point performance2.961 gflops4.454 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M390X 9.32
Pro 5500M 17.55
+88.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M390X 3597
Pro 5500M 6773
+88.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 M390X 9448
Pro 5500M 14725
+55.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−96.7%
59
+96.7%
1440p27−30
−88.9%
51
+88.9%
4K16−18
−93.8%
31
+93.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−100%
55−60
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−89.5%
35−40
+89.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−95.2%
40−45
+95.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−84.6%
45−50
+84.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−80.6%
110−120
+80.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
−88.9%
30−35
+88.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−67.3%
85−90
+67.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−110%
60−65
+110%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−188%
75
+188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−87.1%
55−60
+87.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−39.3%
85−90
+39.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−100%
55−60
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−163%
50
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−95.2%
40−45
+95.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−84.6%
45−50
+84.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−80.6%
110−120
+80.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
−88.9%
30−35
+88.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−67.3%
85−90
+67.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−10.3%
32
+10.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−96.2%
51
+96.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−87.1%
55−60
+87.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−57.7%
40−45
+57.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−39.3%
85−90
+39.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−84.2%
35
+84.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−95.2%
40−45
+95.2%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−80.6%
110−120
+80.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
−88.9%
30−35
+88.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−67.3%
85−90
+67.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−87.1%
55−60
+87.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−50%
39
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−39.3%
85−90
+39.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−108%
54
+108%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−88.9%
30−35
+88.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−81.8%
20−22
+81.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−140%
95−100
+140%
Hitman 3 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−89.5%
35−40
+89.5%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−215%
41
+215%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−209%
30−35
+209%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−94.9%
115
+94.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−133%
35
+133%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Hitman 3 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−137%
90−95
+137%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−77.8%
16
+77.8%

This is how R9 M390X and Pro 5500M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5500M is 97% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5500M is 89% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5500M is 94% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5500M is 217% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro 5500M surpassed R9 M390X in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.32 17.55
Recency 9 June 2015 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

Pro 5500M has a 88.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M390X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M390X is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Radeon R9 M390X
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 251 vote

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.