FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M390X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M390X with FirePro S9000, including specs and performance data.

R9 M390X
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.31

S9000 outperforms R9 M390X by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking510447
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.44
Power efficiency9.564.14
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameAmethystTahiti
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)24 August 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481792
Core clock speed723 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54100.8
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs128112
L1 Cache512 KB448 KB
L2 Cache512 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s264 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_1)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M390X 9.31
FirePro S9000 12.10
+30%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M390X 3895
Samples: 29
FirePro S9000 5059
+29.9%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−20%
60−65
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−20%
60−65
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Fortnite 55−60
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Valorant 90−95
−20.9%
110−120
+20.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−20%
60−65
+20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−25.9%
180−190
+25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Dota 2 65−70
−23.2%
85−90
+23.2%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Fortnite 55−60
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Valorant 90−95
−20.9%
110−120
+20.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Dota 2 65−70
−23.2%
85−90
+23.2%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Valorant 90−95
−20.9%
110−120
+20.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−25%
90−95
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
Valorant 100−110
−25%
130−140
+25%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Valorant 45−50
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.31 12.10
Recency 5 May 2015 24 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 350 Watt

R9 M390X has an age advantage of 2 years, and 250% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9000, on the other hand, has a 30% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The FirePro S9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M390X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M390X is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S9000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 7 votes

Rate FirePro S9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M390X or FirePro S9000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.