ATI Radeon IGP 320M vs R9 M390

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M390 and Radeon IGP 320M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M390
2015
2 GB GDDR5
9.29
+92800%

R9 M390 outperforms ATI IGP 320M by a whopping 92800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4681529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code namePitcairnRS100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 June 2015 (9 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242
Core clock speedno data160 MHz
Boost clock speedno data160 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.16
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 127.0
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44-0−1
4K21-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 0−1
Metro Exodus 24−27 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Valorant 35−40 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Dota 2 22 0−1
Far Cry 5 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
Fortnite 55−60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 34 0−1
Metro Exodus 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+1775%
4−5
−1775%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+725%
4−5
−725%
Valorant 35−40 0−1
World of Tanks 140−150
+1650%
8−9
−1650%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Dota 2 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+1775%
4−5
−1775%
Valorant 35−40 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 0−1
World of Tanks 65−70 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Valorant 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Fortnite 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Valorant 10−11 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R9 M390 is 1800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 M390 surpassed ATI IGP 320M in all 28 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.29 0.01
Recency 9 June 2015 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

R9 M390 has a 92800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 320M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M390
Radeon R9 M390
ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Radeon IGP 320M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 17 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M390 or Radeon IGP 320M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.