Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R9 M390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M390 and Iris Pro Graphics P580, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M390
2015
2 GB GDDR5
9.87
+88.7%

R9 M390 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P580 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking419581
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Gen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)
GPU code namePitcairnSkylake GT4e
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 September 2015 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102472
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data75.60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M390 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 GB
Memory bus width256 BiteDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.1
Vulkanno data1.1.97
Mantle+no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
+100%
21−24
−100%
4K20
+100%
10−12
−100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−33 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−33 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 no data
Hitman 3 6−7 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 no data

This is how R9 M390 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 compete in popular games:

  • R9 M390 is 100% faster in 1080p
  • R9 M390 is 100% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.87 5.23
Recency 9 June 2015 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

The Radeon R9 M390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics P580 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M390
Radeon R9 M390
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics P580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 12 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.