R6 (Carrizo) vs R9 M385X

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

R9 M385X
5.14
+252%

R9 M385X outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by 252% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking582940
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.37no data
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameStrato-XT-M3Carrizo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date16 June 2015 (8 years old)4 June 2015 (8 years old)
Current price$999 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896384
Core clock speed1100 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12-35 Watt
Texture fill rate61.60no data
Floating-point performance1,971 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M385X and Radeon R6 (Carrizo) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity1no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M385X 5.14
+252%
R6 (Carrizo) 1.46

R9 M385X outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by 252% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 M385X 12453
+158%
R6 (Carrizo) 4830

R9 M385X outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by 158% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 M385X 5515
+284%
R6 (Carrizo) 1438

R9 M385X outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by 284% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M385X 3405
+275%
R6 (Carrizo) 909

R9 M385X outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by 275% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M385X 22544
+378%
R6 (Carrizo) 4717

R9 M385X outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by 378% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+145%
11
−145%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Hitman 3 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Hitman 3 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+340%
5
−340%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hitman 3 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

This is how R9 M385X and R6 (Carrizo) compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • R9 M385X is 145% faster than R6 (Carrizo)

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R9 M385X is 1600% faster than the R6 (Carrizo).

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 M385X is ahead in 31 test (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 5.14 1.46

The Radeon R9 M385X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Carrizo) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M385X
Radeon R9 M385X
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
Radeon R6 (Carrizo)

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R9 M385X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 13 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.