Radeon RX 6600 XT vs R9 M385

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

R9 M385
2015
4096 MB GDDR5
5.32

RX 6600 XT outperforms R9 M385 by 701% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking57679
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.4047.45
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameStratoNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 June 2015 (8 years ago)30 July 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379
Current price$999 $283 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 11763% better value for money than R9 M385.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962048
Core clock speedno data1968 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2589 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data160 (TGP) Watt
Texture fill rate56.00331.4
Floating-point performance1,792 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M385 and Radeon RX 6600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
Eyefinity1no data
HDMIno data+

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.1
Vulkanno data1.2
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M385 5.32
RX 6600 XT 42.60
+701%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R9 M385 by 701% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M385 2060
RX 6600 XT 16493
+701%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R9 M385 by 701% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−725%
132
+725%
1440p9−10
−722%
74
+722%
4K5−6
−720%
41
+720%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−778%
79
+778%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−640%
70−75
+640%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−2480%
129
+2480%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−767%
78
+767%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1273%
151
+1273%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−992%
131
+992%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−653%
120−130
+653%
Hitman 3 12−14
−1742%
221
+1742%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1270%
137
+1270%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−590%
65−70
+590%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1177%
166
+1177%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−1614%
120
+1614%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−640%
70−75
+640%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−2020%
106
+2020%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−744%
76
+744%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1182%
141
+1182%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−958%
127
+958%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−653%
120−130
+653%
Hitman 3 12−14
−1425%
183
+1425%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−990%
109
+990%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1088%
95
+1088%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−590%
65−70
+590%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−992%
142
+992%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1500%
176
+1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−1386%
104
+1386%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−640%
70−75
+640%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1400%
75
+1400%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−650%
120−130
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−667%
69
+667%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1109%
133
+1109%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−833%
112
+833%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−653%
120−130
+653%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−800%
99
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−771%
61
+771%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−800%
70−75
+800%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1144%
112
+1144%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−591%
76
+591%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1767%
56
+1767%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−950%
84
+950%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1433%
45−50
+1433%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−8700%
85−90
+8700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1213%
105
+1213%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1860%
98
+1860%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1200%
90−95
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1180%
60−65
+1180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1040%
57
+1040%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−150%
20
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2600%
54
+2600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1300%
28
+1300%
Battlefield 5 0−1 50−55
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14
Far Cry 5 5−6
−920%
51
+920%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−657%
53
+657%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 24

This is how R9 M385 and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 725% faster than R9 M385 in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 722% faster than R9 M385 in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 720% faster than R9 M385 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 8700% faster than the R9 M385.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600 XT surpassed R9 M385 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 5.32 42.60
Recency 16 June 2015 30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M385 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M385 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M385
Radeon R9 M385
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R9 M385 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3633 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.