Radeon R9 M375 vs R9 M380

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M380 and Radeon R9 M375, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M380
2015
4 GB GDDR5
7.12
+185%

R9 M380 outperforms R9 M375 by a whopping 185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking551840
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameStratoTropo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768640
Compute unitsno data10
Core clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1015 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate48.0040.60
Floating-point processing power1.536 TFLOPS1.299 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1100 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
FreeSync++
HD3D++
PowerTune++
DualGraphics++
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore++
Switchable graphics++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCLNot ListedNot Listed
Mantle++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M380 7.12
+185%
R9 M375 2.50

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M380 2771
+185%
R9 M375 973

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+183%
23
−183%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+40%
15
−40%
Fortnite 40−45
+86.4%
22
−86.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+47.1%
17
−47.1%
Valorant 70−75
+73.8%
40−45
−73.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+134%
45−50
−134%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Dota 2 50−55
+60.6%
33
−60.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+61.5%
13
−61.5%
Fortnite 40−45
+156%
16
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+56.3%
16
−56.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Valorant 70−75
+73.8%
40−45
−73.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Dota 2 50−55
+76.7%
30
−76.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+75%
12
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+92.3%
13
−92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Valorant 70−75
+73.8%
40−45
−73.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+273%
10−12
−273%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+206%
16−18
−206%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+129%
16−18
−129%
Valorant 75−80
+267%
21−24
−267%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how R9 M380 and R9 M375 compete in popular games:

  • R9 M380 is 183% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M380 is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 M380 is ahead in 58 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.12 2.50

R9 M380 has a 184.8% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon R9 M380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M375 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M380
Radeon R9 M380
AMD Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R9 M375

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 59 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M380 or Radeon R9 M375, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.