GeForce GT 750M vs Radeon R9 M380

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M380 and GeForce GT 750M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M380
2015
4 GB GDDR5
7.20
+108%

R9 M380 outperforms GT 750M by a whopping 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking545727
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data4.74
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameStratoGK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)9 January 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed900 MHz941 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz967 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0030.94
Floating-point processing power1.536 TFLOPS0.7427 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataDDR3/GDDR5
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1003 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s64.19 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMI-+
HDCP content protection-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI-+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
Blu-Ray 3D Support-+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder-+
Optimus-+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 API
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCLNot Listed1.1
Vulkan-1.1.126
Mantle+-
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M380 7.20
+108%
GT 750M 3.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M380 2773
+108%
GT 750M 1332

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+100%
20
−100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+147%
18−20
−147%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+68%
24−27
−68%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+31.7%
40−45
−31.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+147%
18−20
−147%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+68%
24−27
−68%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−36.4%
30
+36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+31.7%
40−45
−31.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+147%
18−20
−147%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+68%
24−27
−68%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+340%
5
−340%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+31.7%
40−45
−31.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

This is how R9 M380 and GT 750M compete in popular games:

  • R9 M380 is 100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M380 is 2500% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 750M is 36% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 M380 is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
  • GT 750M is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.20 3.46
Recency 5 May 2015 9 January 2013

R9 M380 has a 108.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The Radeon R9 M380 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 750M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M380
Radeon R9 M380
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
GeForce GT 750M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 550 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.