Radeon R5 M330 vs R9 M375X

Place in performance ranking	621	926
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.16	no data
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	Tropo	Exo Pro DDR3
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	7 May 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price	$448	no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	320
Compute units	10	5
Core clock speed	925 MHz	1030 MHz
Boost clock speed	1015 MHz	1030 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	40.60	20.60
Floating-point performance	1,299 gflops	659.2 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M375X and Radeon R5 M330 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	-
Enduro	-	-
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	+
PowerTune	+	+
DualGraphics	1	1
TrueAudio	-	-
ZeroCore	+	+
Switchable graphics	1	1

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	Not Listed	Not Listed
Vulkan	no data	+
Mantle	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M375X 4.46
+190%

R5 M330 1.54

R9 M375X outperforms R5 M330 by 190% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M375X 1727
+190%

R5 M330 595

R9 M375X outperforms R5 M330 by 190% in Passmark.