Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon R9 M370X

Place in the ranking	690	65
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	5.24
Power efficiency	no data	13.02
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Cape Verde	TU102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	19 May 2015 (9 years ago)	13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	4608
Core clock speed	800 MHz	1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	1500 Million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	509.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	96
TMUs	no data	288
Tensor Cores	no data	576
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M370X 4.03

RTX 6000 48.56
+1105%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M370X 1554

RTX 6000 18733
+1105%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−994%

350−400
+994%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

18.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

−1043%

80−85
+1043%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −1082%	130−140 +1082%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1088%	95−100 +1088%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −1082%	130−140 +1082%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −1067%	280−290 +1067%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −1011%	300−310 +1011%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −1088%	95−100 +1088%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −1100%	180−190 +1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −1063%	500−550 +1063%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −1082%	130−140 +1082%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1088%	95−100 +1088%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −1082%	130−140 +1082%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −1067%	280−290 +1067%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −1011%	300−310 +1011%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −1088%	95−100 +1088%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −1100%	120−130 +1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −1100%	180−190 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40 −1025%	450−500 +1025%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −1063%	500−550 +1063%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −1082%	130−140 +1082%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1088%	95−100 +1088%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −1067%	280−290 +1067%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −1011%	300−310 +1011%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −1100%	180−190 +1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 −1088%	95−100 +1088%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −1063%	500−550 +1063%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−1100%

120−130
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1043%	80−85 +1043%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −1067%	70−75 +1067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1100%	60−65 +1100%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −1025%	45−50 +1025%
Hitman 3	8−9 −1088%	95−100 +1088%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −1100%	300−310 +1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−1088%

95−100
+1088%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Hitman 3	0−1	0−1
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−1100%

60−65
+1100%

This is how R9 M370X and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

RTX 6000 is 994% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.03	48.56
Recency	19 May 2015	13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm

RTX 6000 has a 1105% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M370X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M370X is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.