GeForce 9100M G vs Radeon R9 M370X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R9 M370X and GeForce 9100M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
R9 M370X outperforms 9100M G by a whopping 2200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 702 | 1414 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) | no data |
| GPU code name | Cape Verde | MCP77MH MCP79MH |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1500 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_1) | 10 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 32
+3100%
| 1−2
−3100%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+225%
|
4−5
−225%
|
| Valorant | 9−10 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+200%
|
7−8
−200%
|
| Fortnite | 21−24
+2200%
|
1−2
−2200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+600%
|
5−6
−600%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
+225%
|
4−5
−225%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+250%
|
4−5
−250%
|
| Valorant | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 103
+836%
|
10−12
−836%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+200%
|
7−8
−200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+600%
|
5−6
−600%
|
| Valorant | 9−10 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+2600%
|
1−2
−2600%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 27−30
+2800%
|
1−2
−2800%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Valorant | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 4−5 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
This is how R9 M370X and 9100M G compete in popular games:
- R9 M370X is 3100% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M370X is 2600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- R9 M370X is ahead in 28 tests (93%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (7%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.91 | 0.17 |
| Recency | 19 May 2015 | 3 June 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
R9 M370X has a 2200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon R9 M370X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100M G in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
