GeForce 9100M G vs Radeon R9 M370X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R9 M370X and GeForce 9100M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
R9 M370X outperforms 9100M G by a whopping 2139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 702 | 1415 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) | no data |
GPU code name | Cape Verde | MCP77MH MCP79MH |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 19 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 8 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 450 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1500 Million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (FL 11_1) | 10 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 34
+3300%
| 1−2
−3300%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Atomic Heart | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Atomic Heart | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Battlefield 5 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Fortnite | 21−24 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
Valorant | 50−55
+112%
|
24−27
−112%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Battlefield 5 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 103
+836%
|
10−12
−836%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Dota 2 | 35−40
+289%
|
9−10
−289%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Fortnite | 21−24 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 7−8 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 15
+275%
|
4−5
−275%
|
Valorant | 50−55
+112%
|
24−27
−112%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Dota 2 | 35−40
+289%
|
9−10
−289%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
Valorant | 50−55
+112%
|
24−27
−112%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 21−24 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 27−30
+2800%
|
1−2
−2800%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 2−3 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+2700%
|
1−2
−2700%
|
Valorant | 40−45
+3900%
|
1−2
−3900%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
Valorant | 18−20
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Dota 2 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
This is how R9 M370X and 9100M G compete in popular games:
- R9 M370X is 3300% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M370X is 2700% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, R9 M370X surpassed 9100M G in all 32 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.03 | 0.18 |
Recency | 19 May 2015 | 3 June 2008 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
R9 M370X has a 2138.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon R9 M370X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100M G in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.