GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Radeon R9 M365X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M365X and GeForce 9800M GT SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M365X
2015
4 GB GDDR5
3.85
+89.7%

R9 M365X outperforms 9800M GT SLI by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking704887
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.07
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameTropoNB9E-GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)15 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640192
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed900 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rate37.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.184 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1210
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R9 M365X is 700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 M365X surpassed 9800M GT SLI in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.85 2.03
Recency 5 May 2015 15 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

R9 M365X has a 89.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M365X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M365X
Radeon R9 M365X
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT SLI
GeForce 9800M GT SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M365X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9800M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.