Radeon HD 8750A vs R9 M295X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking442not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameAmethystMars
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 November 2014 (11 years ago)2 February 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048384
Core clock speed723 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate92.5414.40
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs12824
L1 Cache512 KB96 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedDDR3
Maximum RAM amount0 MB1 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNot Listed12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 November 2014 2 February 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 45 Watt

R9 M295X has an age advantage of 1 year.

HD 8750A, on the other hand, has 455.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon HD 8750A. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
AMD Radeon HD 8750A
Radeon HD 8750A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 18 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M295X or Radeon HD 8750A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.