Quadro4 400 NVS PCI vs Radeon R9 M295X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking442not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameAmethystNV17 A3
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 November 2014 (11 years ago)16 July 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed723 MHz220 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate92.540.88 ×2
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322 ×2
TMUs1284 ×2
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedDDR
Maximum RAM amount0 MB64 MB ×2
Memory bus widthNot Listed128 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s5.312 GB/s ×2
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x LFH60

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNot Listed8.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 November 2014 16 July 2004
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 18 Watt

R9 M295X has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, on the other hand, has 1289% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M295X and Quadro4 400 NVS PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M295X is a notebook graphics card while Quadro4 400 NVS PCI is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 18 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M295X or Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.