Radeon Pro 570 vs R9 M295X Mac Edition
Aggregated performance score
Pro 570 outperforms R9 M295X Mac Edition by a significant 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 357 | 306 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 12.75 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2017) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | Amethyst | Polaris 20 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 November 2014 (9 years ago) | 5 June 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $356 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1105 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,000 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 | 123.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops | 3,584 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and Radeon Pro 570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | MXM Module | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5448 MHz | 6780 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 174.3 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.39 | 16.37 |
| Recency | 23 November 2014 | 5 June 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 120 Watt |
The Radeon Pro 570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 570 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
