Quadro T600 Mobile vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E8950 R9 M295X R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M390X R9 M395X R9 M395X Mac Edition R9 M485X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition with Quadro T600 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R9 M295X Mac Edition
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
12.35

T600 Mobile outperforms R9 M295X Mac Edition by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M295X Mac Edition
T600 Mobile T600 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking436354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.7932.24
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAmethystTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date23 November 2014 (11 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048896
Core clock speed850 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate108.878.96
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS2.527 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs12856
L1 Cache512 KB896 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1362 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth174.3 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−45.7%
51
+45.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Dota 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 63
+0%
63
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how R9 M295X Mac Edition and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is 46% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.35 16.79
Recency 23 November 2014 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 40 Watt

T600 Mobile has a 36% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T600 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
R9 M295X Radeon R9 M295X
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
R9 M395X Radeon R9 M395X
R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
RX 580X Mobile RX 580X Mobile
R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
RX 570X Mobile RX 570X Mobile
R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
RX 550X Mobile RX 550X Mobile
R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
Pro 580X Pro 580X
R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
RX 7900 XT RX 7900 XT
R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
RX 9060 XT RX 9060 XT
R5 M230 Rebrand Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
R5 M230 Rebrand Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand
vs
Quadro4 100 NVS PCI Quadro4 100 NVS PCI
R5 M230 Rebrand Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand
vs
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 37 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition or Quadro T600 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.