Radeon R7 360 vs R9 M290X Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire with Radeon R7 360, including specs and performance data.

R9 M290X Crossfire
2014
2x 4 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
17.18
+130%

R9 M290X Crossfire outperforms R7 360 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking351580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.84
Power efficiency6.615.76
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNeptune CFTobago
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date1 March 2014 (12 years ago)18 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed850 MHzno data
Boost clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2800 Million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data50.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.613 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data165 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-+
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M290X Crossfire 17.18
+130%
R7 360 7.48

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 M290X Crossfire 10551
+157%
R7 360 4110

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
+158%
24−27
−158%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+148%
40−45
−148%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 35−40
+138%
16−18
−138%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+147%
30−33
−147%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+148%
40−45
−148%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
Fortnite 95−100
+138%
40−45
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+144%
27−30
−144%
Valorant 130−140
+147%
55−60
−147%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+147%
30−33
−147%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+148%
40−45
−148%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+131%
95−100
−131%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
Dota 2 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
Fortnite 95−100
+138%
40−45
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+141%
27−30
−141%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+144%
27−30
−144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Valorant 130−140
+147%
55−60
−147%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+147%
30−33
−147%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
Dota 2 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+138%
24−27
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+144%
27−30
−144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Valorant 130−140
+147%
55−60
−147%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+138%
40−45
−138%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+133%
55−60
−133%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+136%
70−75
−136%
Valorant 160−170
+141%
70−75
−141%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+139%
18−20
−139%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Valorant 95−100
+148%
40−45
−148%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Dota 2 60−65
+154%
24−27
−154%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%

This is how R9 M290X Crossfire and R7 360 compete in popular games:

  • R9 M290X Crossfire is 158% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.18 7.48
Recency 1 March 2014 18 June 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 100 Watt

R9 M290X Crossfire has a 130% higher aggregate performance score.

R7 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 360 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 360 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 746 votes

Rate Radeon R7 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire or Radeon R7 360, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.