GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire with GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM, including specs and performance data.

R9 M290X Crossfire
2014
2x 4 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
16.35
+32.1%

R9 M290X Crossfire outperforms 760 Ti OEM by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking349418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.605.88
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNeptune CFGK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2014 (11 years ago)27 September 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601344
Core clock speed850 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz980 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2800 Million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rateno data109.8
Floating-point processing powerno data2.634 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data112
L1 Cacheno data112 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Fortnite 95−100
+35.7%
70−75
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+44%
50−55
−44%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
Valorant 130−140
+36%
100−105
−36%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+37.5%
160−170
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Dota 2 100−110
+38.7%
75−80
−38.7%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Fortnite 95−100
+35.7%
70−75
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+44%
50−55
−44%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Valorant 130−140
+36%
100−105
−36%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Dota 2 100−110
+38.7%
75−80
−38.7%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+44%
50−55
−44%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Valorant 130−140
+36%
100−105
−36%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+35.7%
70−75
−35.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+35.8%
95−100
−35.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+38.3%
120−130
−38.3%
Valorant 160−170
+40.8%
120−130
−40.8%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Valorant 95−100
+41.4%
70−75
−41.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Dota 2 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

This is how R9 M290X Crossfire and GTX 760 Ti OEM compete in popular games:

  • R9 M290X Crossfire is 38% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.35 12.38
Recency 1 March 2014 27 September 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 170 Watt

R9 M290X Crossfire has a 32.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 months.

GTX 760 Ti OEM, on the other hand, has 17.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 94 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire or GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.