GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M290X Crossfire
2014
2x 4 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
16.35
+51.4%

R9 M290X Crossfire outperforms 1050 Mobile 3 GB by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking349453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.6211.66
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNeptune CFGP107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2014 (11 years ago)1 February 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed850 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2800 Million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data69.22
Floating-point processing powerno data2.215 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data84.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
+55%
40−45
−55%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+52.3%
65−70
−52.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+64.4%
45−50
−64.4%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+52.3%
65−70
−52.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+62.9%
35−40
−62.9%
Fortnite 95−100
+58.3%
60−65
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+60%
45−50
−60%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
Valorant 130−140
+60%
85−90
−60%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+64.4%
45−50
−64.4%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+52.3%
65−70
−52.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+57.1%
140−150
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Dota 2 100−110
+60%
65−70
−60%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+62.9%
35−40
−62.9%
Fortnite 95−100
+58.3%
60−65
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+60%
45−50
−60%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Valorant 130−140
+60%
85−90
−60%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+64.4%
45−50
−64.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Dota 2 100−110
+60%
65−70
−60%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+62.9%
35−40
−62.9%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+60%
45−50
−60%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Valorant 130−140
+60%
85−90
−60%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+58.3%
60−65
−58.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+51.8%
85−90
−51.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+66%
100−105
−66%
Valorant 160−170
+53.6%
110−120
−53.6%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+66.7%
30−33
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Valorant 95−100
+52.3%
65−70
−52.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Dota 2 60−65
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%

This is how R9 M290X Crossfire and GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB compete in popular games:

  • R9 M290X Crossfire is 55% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.35 10.80
Recency 1 March 2014 1 February 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 75 Watt

R9 M290X Crossfire has a 51.4% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 69 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire or GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.