Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Radeon R9 M280X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M265X M270 M270X M275 M275X M280X M290X M290X Crossfire M290X Mac Edition M295X M295X Mac Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M280X with Quadro T1000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

R9 M280X
2015
0 MB Not Listed
1.94

T1000 Max-Q outperforms R9 M280X by a whopping 722% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 M280X R9 M280X
T1000 Max-Q T1000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking944369
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.51
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSaturnTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 February 2015 (11 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896896
Core clock speed1000 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate61.6075.60
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPS2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs5656
L1 Cache224 KB896 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount0 MB4 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M280X 1.94
T1000 Max-Q 15.94
+722%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M280X 813
Samples: 5
T1000 Max-Q 6666
+720%
Samples: 337

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−715%
220−230
+715%
4K18
−678%
140−150
+678%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2933%
90−95
+2933%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1280%
65−70
+1280%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2933%
90−95
+2933%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Far Cry 5 12
−342%
50−55
+342%
Fortnite 9−10
−889%
85−90
+889%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−509%
65−70
+509%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−1175%
50−55
+1175%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Valorant 35−40
−233%
130−140
+233%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1280%
65−70
+1280%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2933%
90−95
+2933%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 67
−213%
210−220
+213%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Dota 2 36
−175%
95−100
+175%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−960%
50−55
+960%
Fortnite 9−10
−889%
85−90
+889%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−509%
65−70
+509%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−1175%
50−55
+1175%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−1933%
60−65
+1933%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−175%
40−45
+175%
Valorant 35−40
−233%
130−140
+233%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1280%
65−70
+1280%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Dota 2 31
−219%
95−100
+219%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−960%
50−55
+960%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−509%
65−70
+509%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−389%
40−45
+389%
Valorant 35−40
−233%
130−140
+233%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−889%
85−90
+889%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−750%
110−120
+750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−726%
150−160
+726%
Valorant 12−14
−1138%
160−170
+1138%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1100%
35−40
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−1133%
35−40
+1133%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−100%
30−33
+100%
Valorant 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6−7
Dota 2 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
Far Cry 5 0−1 18−20
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 27−30
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how R9 M280X and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is 715% faster in 1080p
  • T1000 Max-Q is 678% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 2933% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q performs better in 53 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.94 15.94
Recency 5 February 2015 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

T1000 Max-Q has a 721.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M280X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M280X is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Radeon R9 M280X
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 M280X Radeon R9 M280X
vs
GT 445M GeForce GT 445M
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
vs
Pro 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M
R9 M280X Radeon R9 M280X
vs
R8 M445DX Radeon R8 M445DX
M1000M M1000M
vs
Quadro4 750 XGL Quadro4 750 XGL
M1000M M1000M
vs
Arc Pro A60 Arc Pro A60
R9 M280X R9 M280X
vs
R7 M460 R7 M460
R9 M280X R9 M280X
vs
HD 8550M HD 8550M
R9 M280X R9 M280X
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200
R9 M280X R9 M280X
vs
A800 PCIe 80 GB A800 PCIe 80 GB
R9 M280X R9 M280X
vs
RX 6550S RX 6550S
GeForce 945M 945M
vs
HD Graphics (Braswell) HD Graphics (Braswell)
GeForce 945M 945M
vs
Go 7950 GTX SLI Go 7950 GTX SLI
GeForce 945M 945M
vs
Go 7950 GTX Go 7950 GTX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M280X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M280X or Quadro T1000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.