Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon R9 M275X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E8860 HD 8830M HD 8850M HD 8870M R9 M265X R9 M270X R9 M275 R9 M275X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M275X with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R9 M275X
2014
4 GB GDDR5
3.85

T500 Mobile outperforms R9 M275X by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 M275X R9 M275X
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking755555
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data35.26
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVenusTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date28 January 2014 (12 years ago)2 December 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640896
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed900 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rate37.0094.92
Floating-point processing power1.184 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4056
L1 Cache160 KB896 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−125%
36
+125%
1440p7−8
−114%
15
+114%
4K7−8
−143%
17
+143%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how R9 M275X and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is 125% faster in 1080p
  • T500 Mobile is 114% faster in 1440p
  • T500 Mobile is 143% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 51 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.85 8.25
Recency 28 January 2014 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

R9 M275X has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 114.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M275X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M275X is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R9 M275X
Radeon R9 M275X
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
Radeon 540X Radeon 540X
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
Tesla C1060 Tesla C1060
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
FX 5800 Quadro FX 5800
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
Plex 2200 D2 Quadro Plex 2200 D2
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
Tesla S1070 Tesla S1070
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
FX 550M Quadro FX 550M
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
A100 SXM4 40 GB A100 SXM4 40 GB
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
T400 Mobile Quadro T400 Mobile
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
Tesla C1080 Tesla C1080
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
9300M GS DDR2 GeForce 9300M GS DDR2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M275X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 113 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M275X or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.