GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon R9 M275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E8860 HD 8830M HD 8850M HD 8870M R9 M265X R9 M270X R9 M275 R9 M275X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M275 with GeForce GTX 460 OEM, including specs and performance data.

R9 M275
2014, $800
2 GB GDDR5
2.66

460 OEM outperforms R9 M275 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 M275 R9 M275
GTX 460 OEM GTX 460 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking856836
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Power efficiencyno data1.45
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVenusGF104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 January 2014 (12 years ago)11 October 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640336
Core clock speed900 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate37.0036.40
Floating-point processing power1.184 TFLOPS0.8736 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4056
L1 Cache160 KB448 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz850 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s108.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
+0%
24−27
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p33.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Valorant 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Valorant 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how R9 M275 and GTX 460 OEM compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.66 2.82
Recency 28 January 2014 11 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R9 M275 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 460 OEM, on the other hand, has a 6% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M275 and GeForce GTX 460 OEM.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M275 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 M275 Radeon R9 M275
vs
R6 M340DX Radeon R6 M340DX
GTX 460 OEM GeForce GTX 460 OEM
vs
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
R9 M275 Radeon R9 M275
vs
GeForce 840A GeForce 840A
R9 M275 AMD R9 M275
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4830 4830
R9 M275 AMD R9 M275
vs
505 OEM 505 OEM
R9 M275 AMD R9 M275
vs
GT 640 OEM 640 OEM
R9 M275 AMD R9 M275
vs
R9 M370X Mac Edition M370X Mac Edition
R9 M275 AMD R9 M275
vs
HD 8730A 8730A
R9 M275 AMD R9 M275
vs
ATI FireGL V7200 V7200
R9 M275 AMD R9 M275
vs
GTX 1060 5 GB 1060 5 GB
R9 M275 AMD R9 M275
vs
HD 8330 Mobile IGP 8330 Mobile IGP
R9 M275 AMD R9 M275
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 2006 AGP Edition 2006 AGP Edition
R9 M275 AMD R9 M275
vs
Radeon 680M 680M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 20 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M275 or GeForce GTX 460 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.