ATI 8514-Ultra vs Radeon R9 M275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking847not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameVenusMach8
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 January 2014 (11 years ago)1992 (33 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799.99 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed900 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm800 nm
Texture fill rate37.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.184 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs40no data
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16ISA 16 Bit
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5VRAM
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s40 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 800 nm

R9 M275 has a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M275 and 8514-Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M275 is a notebook graphics card while 8514-Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M275
Radeon R9 M275
ATI 8514-Ultra
8514-Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate 8514-Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M275 or 8514-Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.