UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R9 M270X

Aggregated performance score

R9 M270X
2014
4096 MB GDDR5
3.11
+1%

Radeon R9 M270X outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking715720
Place by popularitynot in top-10030
Value for moneyno data0.37
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Gen. 9.5 (2017)
GPU code nameVenusKaby-Lake-H-GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 March 2014 (10 years ago)1 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Current priceno data$457

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64024
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed725 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed775 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate31.0026.45
Floating-point performance1,536 gflops460.8 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
Quick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.1
Vulkanno data1.1.103
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M270X 3.11
+1%
UHD Graphics 630 3.08

Radeon R9 M270X outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M270X 1204
+1%
UHD Graphics 630 1192

Radeon R9 M270X outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−6.3%
17
+6.3%
1440p10−12
+0%
10
+0%
4K7−8
+0%
7
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.11 3.08
Recency 21 March 2014 1 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M270X and UHD Graphics 630.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M270X
Radeon R9 M270X
Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M270X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3410 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.