Arc Pro A50 vs Radeon R9 M265X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking743not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Generation 12.7 (2022)
GPU code nameVenus ProDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2014 (10 years ago)8 August 2022 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401024
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed625 MHzno data
Boost clock speed625 MHz2350 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate25.00150.4
Floating-point performance800.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M265X and Arc Pro A50 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Eyefinity1no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
Mantle+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2014 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M265X and Arc Pro A50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M265X is a notebook card while Arc Pro A50 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M265X
Radeon R9 M265X
Intel Arc Pro A50
Arc Pro A50

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M265X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro A50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.