Arc Pro A50 vs Radeon E8860

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking737not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.37no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameVenusDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date25 January 2014 (11 years ago)8 August 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401024
Core clock speed575 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed625 MHz2350 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate25.00150.4
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4064
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 January 2014 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 75 Watt

Radeon E8860 has 102.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon E8860 and Arc Pro A50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon E8860 is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro A50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon E8860
Radeon E8860
Intel Arc Pro A50
Arc Pro A50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Radeon E8860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5 votes

Rate Arc Pro A50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon E8860 or Arc Pro A50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.