ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 vs R9 Fury
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R9 Fury with Mobility Radeon HD 5430, including specs and performance data.
R9 Fury outperforms Mobility HD 5430 by a whopping 6591% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 274 | 1356 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.05 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.36 | 3.73 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | Fiji | Park |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 10 July 2015 (10 years ago) | 7 January 2010 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | 80 |
| Compute units | 56 | no data |
| Core clock speed | no data | 500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,900 million | 292 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 275 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 224.0 | 4.000 |
| Floating-point processing power | 7.168 TFLOPS | 0.08 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 4 |
| TMUs | 224 | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 8 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 128 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | no data |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR3 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | + | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 12.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| DisplayPort support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | + | - |
| CrossFire | + | - |
| FRTC | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| LiquidVR | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| TressFX | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
| DDMA audio | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| Mantle | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 90
+8900%
| 1−2
−8900%
|
| 1440p | 106
+10500%
| 1−2
−10500%
|
| 4K | 48 | 0−1 |
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 6.10 | no data |
| 1440p | 5.18 | no data |
| 4K | 11.44 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140
+13000%
|
1−2
−13000%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+4900%
|
1−2
−4900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
+840%
|
5−6
−840%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+9200%
|
1−2
−9200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140
+13000%
|
1−2
−13000%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+4900%
|
1−2
−4900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 75−80
+7400%
|
1−2
−7400%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
+11500%
|
1−2
−11500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+2200%
|
4−5
−2200%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 70−75
+7200%
|
1−2
−7200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
+840%
|
5−6
−840%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 90−95
+1200%
|
7−8
−1200%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+523%
|
24−27
−523%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+9200%
|
1−2
−9200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140
+13000%
|
1−2
−13000%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 268
+1814%
|
14−16
−1814%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+4900%
|
1−2
−4900%
|
| Dota 2 | 120−130
+1100%
|
10−11
−1100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 75−80
+7400%
|
1−2
−7400%
|
| Fortnite | 95
+9400%
|
1−2
−9400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+2200%
|
4−5
−2200%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 70−75
+7200%
|
1−2
−7200%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 85−90
+8400%
|
1−2
−8400%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
+840%
|
5−6
−840%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 90−95
+1200%
|
7−8
−1200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 91
+1720%
|
5−6
−1720%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+523%
|
24−27
−523%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+9200%
|
1−2
−9200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+4900%
|
1−2
−4900%
|
| Dota 2 | 130
+1200%
|
10−11
−1200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 75−80
+7400%
|
1−2
−7400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+2200%
|
4−5
−2200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
+840%
|
5−6
−840%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50
+614%
|
7−8
−614%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 46
+820%
|
5−6
−820%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+523%
|
24−27
−523%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 72
+7100%
|
1−2
−7100%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+1533%
|
3−4
−1533%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 158
+15700%
|
1−2
−15700%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+4250%
|
4−5
−4250%
|
| Valorant | 200−210
+9900%
|
2−3
−9900%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+5800%
|
1−2
−5800%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+3600%
|
1−2
−3600%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 109
+10800%
|
1−2
−10800%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 47
+236%
|
14−16
−236%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 36 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 130−140
+6650%
|
2−3
−6650%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 102
+10100%
|
1−2
−10100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 20
+1900%
|
1−2
−1900%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 25
+1150%
|
2−3
−1150%
|
This is how R9 Fury and ATI Mobility HD 5430 compete in popular games:
- R9 Fury is 8900% faster in 1080p
- R9 Fury is 10500% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 Fury is 15700% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, R9 Fury surpassed ATI Mobility HD 5430 in all 31 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.75 | 0.34 |
| Recency | 10 July 2015 | 7 January 2010 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 275 Watt | 7 Watt |
R9 Fury has a 6591.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
ATI Mobility HD 5430, on the other hand, has 3828.6% lower power consumption.
The Radeon R9 Fury is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5430 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R9 Fury is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5430 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
