GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Radeon R9 Fury

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 Fury with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R9 Fury
2015
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 275 Watt
24.84

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms R9 Fury by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking20139
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.62no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 (2015−2016)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameFijiGN21-X11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 June 2015 (9 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data
Current price$44 (0.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35849728
Compute units56no data
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate224.0515.3
Floating-point performance7,168 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 Fury and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors​2x 8-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune+no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+no data
CUDAno data8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 Fury 24.84
RTX 4090 Mobile 54.61
+120%

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 Fury by 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 Fury 17543
RTX 4090 Mobile 64746
+269%

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 Fury by 269% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 Fury 42039
RTX 4090 Mobile 113387
+170%

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 Fury by 170% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 Fury 14580
RTX 4090 Mobile 46191
+217%

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 Fury by 217% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 Fury 80439
RTX 4090 Mobile 143771
+78.7%

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 Fury by 79% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD92
−89.1%
174
+89.1%
1440p106
−26.4%
134
+26.4%
4K47
−76.6%
83
+76.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−123%
156
+123%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−135%
90−95
+135%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−132%
170−180
+132%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−133%
100−110
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−137%
142
+137%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−136%
100−110
+136%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−120%
130−140
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−130%
180−190
+130%
Hitman 3 75−80
−124%
168
+124%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−121%
354
+121%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−122%
130−140
+122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−130%
110−120
+130%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180−190
−123%
401
+123%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−122%
144
+122%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
−120%
187
+120%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−132%
170−180
+132%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−133%
100−110
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−127%
136
+127%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−136%
100−110
+136%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−120%
130−140
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−130%
180−190
+130%
Hitman 3 35−40
−137%
83
+137%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
−127%
220−230
+127%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−143%
73
+143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−130%
110−120
+130%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
−128%
387
+128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
−132%
394
+132%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−136%
110−120
+136%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
−130%
161
+130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−133%
100−110
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−127%
125
+127%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−136%
100−110
+136%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−130%
180−190
+130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−135%
305
+135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
−132%
371
+132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
−127%
204
+127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−140%
120
+140%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−130%
110−120
+130%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−128%
110−120
+128%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−131%
120−130
+131%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−126%
60−65
+126%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−133%
128
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−149%
85−90
+149%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−138%
95
+138%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−134%
152
+134%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−122%
120−130
+122%
Hitman 3 60−65
−130%
138
+130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−130%
253
+130%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−133%
128
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−128%
297
+128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−134%
164
+134%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−142%
109
+142%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−135%
90−95
+135%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−122%
60−65
+122%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Hitman 3 18−20
−156%
45−50
+156%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−135%
129
+135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−127%
102
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−131%
150
+131%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−128%
40−45
+128%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−123%
78
+123%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−138%
35−40
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−129%
48
+129%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−134%
80−85
+134%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−129%
149
+129%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−127%
102
+127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−130%
69
+130%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−121%
50−55
+121%

This is how R9 Fury and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 89% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 26% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 77% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.84 54.61
Recency 16 June 2015 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 150 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 Fury in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 Fury is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 163 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Fury on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 511 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.