GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury

Place in the ranking	223	35
Place by popularity	not in top-100	16
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.04	81.96
Power efficiency	6.23	25.59
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Fiji	AD106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	10 July 2015 (9 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 Ti has 919% better value for money than R9 Fury.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	4352
Compute units	56	no data
Core clock speed	no data	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	8,900 million	22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	275 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	224.0	344.8
Floating-point processing power	7.168 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	224	136
Tensor Cores	no data	136
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 16-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)	GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)	+	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity	+	-
Number of Eyefinity displays	6	no data
HDMI	+	+
DisplayPort support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
FRTC	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
LiquidVR	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
TressFX	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.3	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
Mantle	+	-
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 Fury 24.85

RTX 4060 Ti 59.33
+139%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 Fury 9555

RTX 4060 Ti 22811
+139%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	89 −136%	210−220 +136%
1440p	97 −137%	230−240 +137%
4K	49 −124%	110−120 +124%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.17 −225%	1.90 +225%
1440p	5.66 −226%	1.73 +226%
4K	11.20 −209%	3.63 +209%

RTX 4060 Ti has 225% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti has 226% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti has 209% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −117%	100−105 +117%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −120%	110−120 +120%
Elden Ring	80−85 −135%	190−200 +135%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −137%	180−190 +137%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −117%	100−105 +117%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −120%	110−120 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −139%	260−270 +139%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −131%	150−160 +131%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −122%	120−130 +122%
Valorant	100−105 −130%	230−240 +130%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −137%	180−190 +137%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −117%	100−105 +117%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −120%	110−120 +120%
Dota 2	85−90 −135%	200−210 +135%
Elden Ring	80−85 −135%	190−200 +135%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −137%	180−190 +137%
Fortnite	120−130 −132%	290−300 +132%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −139%	260−270 +139%
Grand Theft Auto V	85−90 −135%	200−210 +135%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −131%	150−160 +131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −124%	350−400 +124%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −122%	120−130 +122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	76 −137%	180−190 +137%
Valorant	100−105 −130%	230−240 +130%
World of Tanks	268 −124%	600−650 +124%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −137%	180−190 +137%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −117%	100−105 +117%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −120%	110−120 +120%
Dota 2	130 −131%	300−310 +131%
Far Cry 5	101 −138%	240−250 +138%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −139%	260−270 +139%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −124%	350−400 +124%
Valorant	100−105 −130%	230−240 +130%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	40−45 −138%	100−105 +138%
Elden Ring	40−45 −127%	100−105 +127%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 −138%	100−105 +138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −129%	400−450 +129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −117%	50−55 +117%
World of Tanks	158 −122%	350−400 +122%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −120%	110−120 +120%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −136%	170−180 +136%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −127%	150−160 +127%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −128%	130−140 +128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −136%	85−90 +136%
Valorant	65−70 −124%	150−160 +124%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Dota 2	47 −134%	110−120 +134%
Elden Ring	20−22 −125%	45−50 +125%
Grand Theft Auto V	47 −134%	110−120 +134%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −137%	45−50 +137%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −137%	180−190 +137%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 −134%	110−120 +134%
World of Tanks	109 −139%	260−270 +139%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −131%	60−65 +131%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Dota 2	102 −135%	240−250 +135%
Far Cry 5	38 −137%	90−95 +137%
Fortnite	35 −129%	80−85 +129%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −137%	90−95 +137%
Valorant	30−35 −134%	75−80 +134%

This is how R9 Fury and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti is 136% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti is 137% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti is 124% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.85	59.33
Recency	10 July 2015	18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	275 Watt	160 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti has a 138.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 71.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 Fury in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.