GeForce 8200M G vs Radeon R9 Fury

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 Fury with GeForce 8200M G, including specs and performance data.

R9 Fury
2015, $549
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 275 Watt
22.75
+14119%

R9 Fury outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 14119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2751488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.07no data
Power efficiency6.37no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)no data
GPU code nameFijiMCP77MV MCP79MVL
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 July 2015 (10 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35848
Compute units56no data
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Wattno data
Texture fill rate224.0no data
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs224no data
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors​2x 8-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)no data
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width4096 Bitno data
Memory clock speed500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1210
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan+-
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 Fury 22.75
+14119%
8200M G 0.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 Fury 9526
+14555%
Samples: 453
8200M G 65
Samples: 366

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD900−1
1440p1060−1
4K48-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.10no data
1440p5.18no data
4K11.44no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Far Cry 5 75−80 0−1
Fortnite 110−120 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+1200%
7−8
−1200%
Valorant 160−170
+575%
24−27
−575%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 268
+2336%
10−12
−2336%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Dota 2 120−130
+1400%
8−9
−1400%
Far Cry 5 75−80 0−1
Fortnite 95 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90 0−1
Metro Exodus 50−55 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+1200%
7−8
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91
+1720%
5−6
−1720%
Valorant 160−170
+575%
24−27
−575%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Dota 2 130
+1525%
8−9
−1525%
Far Cry 5 75−80 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50
+614%
7−8
−614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+820%
5−6
−820%
Valorant 160−170
+575%
24−27
−575%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 72 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+1533%
3−4
−1533%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 158
+15700%
1−2
−15700%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 0−1
Metro Exodus 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+8600%
2−3
−8600%
Valorant 200−210
+19900%
1−2
−19900%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 109 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 47
+236%
14−16
−236%
Metro Exodus 20−22 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36 0−1
Valorant 130−140
+13500%
1−2
−13500%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 102 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the R9 Fury is 13500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 Fury surpassed 8200M G in all 26 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.75 0.16
Recency 10 July 2015 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm

R9 Fury has a 14119% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 Fury is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 Fury is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8200M G is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 196 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Fury on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 40 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 Fury or GeForce 8200M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.