Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon R9 FURY X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
255 OEM 260 OEM 270 270 1024SP 270X 280 280X 280X2 285 290 290X 290X2 295X2 360 OEM 370 370 1024SP 370X 380 380 OEM 380X 390 390 X2 390X 390X2 A375 Fury FURY X FURY X2 Nano
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 FURY X with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R9 FURY X
2015, $649
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 275 Watt
22.43
+29.5%

R9 FURY X outperforms T1200 Mobile by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 FURY X R9 FURY X
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking283348
Place by popularity47not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.83no data
Power efficiency6.2673.90
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameFijiTU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 June 2015 (10 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961024
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data855 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate268.891.20
Floating-point processing power8.602 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25664
L1 Cache1 MB1 MB
L2 Cache2 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length195 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 FURY X 22.43
+29.5%
T1200 Mobile 17.32

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 FURY X 16710
+64.9%
T1200 Mobile 10134

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+29.3%
58
−29.3%
1440p40−45
+21.2%
33
−21.2%
4K100−110
+23.5%
81
−23.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.65no data
1440p16.23no data
4K6.49no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how R9 FURY X and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • R9 FURY X is 29% faster in 1080p
  • R9 FURY X is 21% faster in 1440p
  • R9 FURY X is 23% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 51 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 22.43 17.32
Recency 24 June 2015 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 18 Watt

R9 FURY X has a 29.5% higher aggregate performance score.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1427.8% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 FURY X is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 FURY X is a desktop graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Radeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 FURY X Radeon R9 FURY X
vs
RX 590 Radeon RX 590
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
R9 FURY X Radeon R9 FURY X
vs
GTX 780 Ti GeForce GTX 780 Ti
RX 550 RX 550
vs
Instinct MI50 Instinct MI50
RX 550 RX 550
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB
RX 570 RX 570
vs
GeForce 920MX 920MX
R7 450 OEM R7 450 OEM
vs
RX Vega XL RX Vega XL
R9 380X R9 380X
vs
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
R7 360 R7 360
vs
RX 7700S RX 7700S
R9 285 R9 285
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake)
R7 250XE R7 250XE
vs
RX Vega XL RX Vega XL
R5 230 R5 230
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
R9 280 R9 280
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 91 votes

Rate Radeon R9 FURY X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 160 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 FURY X or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.