GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 FURY X and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 FURY X
2015
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 275 Watt
24.86

RTX 3070 Ti outperforms R9 FURY X by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking22835
Place by popularitynot in top-10087
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.9452.72
Power efficiency6.2114.43
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameFijiGA104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 June 2015 (9 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 3070 Ti has 660% better value for money than R9 FURY X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40966144
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt290 Watt
Texture fill rate268.8339.8
Floating-point processing power8.602 TFLOPS21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs256192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length191 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 12-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR6X
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s608.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 FURY X 24.86
RTX 3070 Ti 60.92
+145%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 FURY X 9579
RTX 3070 Ti 23472
+145%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 FURY X 16710
RTX 3070 Ti 37663
+125%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
−153%
177
+153%
1440p35−40
−166%
93
+166%
4K24−27
−150%
60
+150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.27
−174%
3.38
+174%
1440p18.54
−188%
6.44
+188%
4K27.04
−171%
9.98
+171%
  • RTX 3070 Ti has 174% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti has 188% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti has 171% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 193
+0%
193
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 178
+0%
178
+0%
Atomic Heart 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 152
+0%
152
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 141
+0%
141
+0%
Far Cry 5 205
+0%
205
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 210
+0%
210
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Atomic Heart 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Dota 2 249
+0%
249
+0%
Far Cry 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 173
+0%
173
+0%
Metro Exodus 145
+0%
145
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 292
+0%
292
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+0%
113
+0%
Dota 2 230
+0%
230
+0%
Far Cry 5 183
+0%
183
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
+0%
147
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 137
+0%
137
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+0%
73
+0%
Far Cry 5 150
+0%
150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35
+0%
35
+0%
Dota 2 194
+0%
194
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how R9 FURY X and RTX 3070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is 153% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 166% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 150% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.86 60.92
Recency 24 June 2015 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 290 Watt

R9 FURY X has 5.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 145.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 FURY X in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Radeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3
84 votes

Rate Radeon R9 FURY X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
6534 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 FURY X or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.