Radeon RX 7900M vs R9 390X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390X with Radeon RX 7900M, including specs and performance data.

R9 390X
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
24.44

RX 7900M outperforms R9 390X by a whopping 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking20633
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.62no data
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)RDNA 3
GPU code nameGrenada XTNavi 31
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date16 June 2015 (9 years ago)19 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data
Current price$19.99 (0x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28164608
Core clock speedno data1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2090 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt180 Watt (160 - 200 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate184.8601.9
Floating-point performance5,914 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 390X and Radeon RX 7900M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MB16 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 390X 24.44
RX 7900M 57.64
+136%

RX 7900M outperforms R9 390X by 136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 390X 9439
RX 7900M 22261
+136%

RX 7900M outperforms R9 390X by 136% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 390X 17944
RX 7900M 59943
+234%

RX 7900M outperforms R9 390X by 234% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 390X 12389
RX 7900M 50241
+306%

RX 7900M outperforms R9 390X by 306% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD86
−68.6%
145
+68.6%
1440p40−45
−165%
106
+165%
4K47
−61.7%
76
+61.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−169%
90−95
+169%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−148%
95−100
+148%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−144%
180−190
+144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−142%
100−110
+142%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−142%
100−110
+142%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−153%
130−140
+153%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−139%
190−200
+139%
Hitman 3 45−50
−149%
110−120
+149%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
−141%
240−250
+141%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−145%
130−140
+145%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−160%
110−120
+160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
−154%
250−260
+154%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−144%
120−130
+144%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−169%
90−95
+169%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−148%
95−100
+148%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−144%
180−190
+144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−142%
100−110
+142%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−142%
100−110
+142%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−153%
130−140
+153%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−139%
190−200
+139%
Hitman 3 45−50
−149%
110−120
+149%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
−141%
240−250
+141%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−145%
130−140
+145%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−160%
110−120
+160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
−154%
250−260
+154%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−154%
160−170
+154%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−144%
120−130
+144%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−169%
90−95
+169%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−148%
95−100
+148%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−142%
100−110
+142%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−142%
100−110
+142%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−139%
190−200
+139%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
−141%
240−250
+141%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
−146%
344
+146%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−140%
168
+140%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−144%
120−130
+144%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−160%
110−120
+160%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−148%
120−130
+148%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−140%
130−140
+140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−156%
65−70
+156%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−160%
90−95
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−146%
123
+146%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−136%
130−140
+136%
Hitman 3 30−33
−170%
80−85
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−149%
130−140
+149%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−153%
100−110
+153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
−149%
249
+149%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−143%
95−100
+143%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−145%
95−100
+145%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−157%
50−55
+157%
Hitman 3 18−20
−172%
45−50
+172%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−173%
80−85
+173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−153%
76
+153%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−158%
116
+158%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−144%
40−45
+144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−163%
40−45
+163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−156%
40−45
+156%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−138%
35−40
+138%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−151%
85−90
+151%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−173%
80−85
+173%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−144%
65−70
+144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−138%
55−60
+138%

This is how R9 390X and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900M is 69% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900M is 165% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900M is 62% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.44 57.64
Recency 16 June 2015 19 October 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 180 Watt

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 390X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390X is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7900M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 242 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 49 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.